W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > February 2014

Re: [beacon] Random comments

From: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:44:53 -0500
Message-ID: <52FC1585.9090201@mozilla.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
On 2/12/14, 6:33 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
>> On 2/12/14 5:52 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>>
>>> I personally think C makes the most sense since it doesn't involve
>>> grabbing some omnious global state. Instead the behavior is determined
>>> by the more tangible answer to the question "which object did you call
>>> a function on".
>>
>> What object, or what function?
>>
>> Consider windowC.navigator.sendBeacon.apply(windowD.navigator, args)
>
> I would say D here. Carrying state in functions feels a lot more hacky
> than carrying state in objects.

That was my reaction as well.

--Richard


>
> / Jonas
>
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 00:45:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:38 UTC