- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 01:03:37 -0400
- To: Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>
- CC: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
On 5/2/13 12:54 AM, Arvind Jain wrote: > We can special case "initial about:blank" page in the navigationStart > definition - not a big deal. But could you look at the spec and see if > it makes sense when we have a page that was not navigated to? I haven't read the processing model in detail in a while, honestly. But last I checked, the processing model only runs during navigation, so wouldn't ever get triggered for the initial about:blank. > It'd be great if you could suggest the actual wording to incorporate the > "initial about:blank" page such that the entire spec makes sense. The simplest thing to do is to define somewhere that when the initial about:blank is constructed it gets a performance.timing with certain values in it. This shouldn't need to affect the "when navigation happens" processing model in any way. -Boris
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 05:04:07 UTC