W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > October 2012

Re: [NavigationTiming2] Comments and questions about the Navigation Timing 2 draft

From: Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:14:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CADXXVKrbNtv8FNFokurv_xTyiWMqYK+ZHt5Bpcyvh2YsWK3EDA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: public-web-perf@w3.org
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 10/11/12 1:55 PM, Ilya Grigorik wrote:
>
>> Right, both (1) and (2) are contextual to each individual page. However,
>> perhaps somewhat naively, I still equate the "layout flush" to "first
>> paint"
>>
>
> Ah.  They have pretty much nothing to do with each other, apart from
> "first paint" probably happening after "layout start".  Probably.


Right, that's my assumption as well. Coming back to your earlier point: "I
suspect it's plausible to report the time of the first time you told your
graphics hardware to actually go ahead and put stuff on screen."

I think that's a good definition to shoot for. Now, how do we get there? :)

ig
Received on Thursday, 11 October 2012 18:15:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 11 October 2012 18:15:46 GMT