W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > May 2012

Re: [agenda] Web Performance WG Teleconference #73 Agenda 2012-05-16

From: Sigbjørn Vik <sigbjorn@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 20:37:01 +0200
To: public-web-perf@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.weezbzi0pi0hod@india.oslo.osa>
On Wed, 16 May 2012 03:14:42 +0200, Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>  

> Below is the proposed agenda for tomorrow's meetings.
> 3.       Creating Navigation Timing 2 specification resolution

It was good to be part of the meeting, and hear people directly. It seems  
as if we talked about standards in different ways though, so let me  
clarify my stance. Publishing a recommendation carries several meanings:

1) User agents wishing to implement this feature are recommended to use  
this spec
2) User agents wishing to be compatible, are recommended to follow this  
spec exactly
3) This spec is stable, and intended to be used on the web for a long time
4) Web developers are recommended to use this spec
5) Web developers may expect this spec to be/become supported in user  

For Navigation Timing, I fully support 2), but I don't think we should  
promote any of the other points.

Sigbjørn Vik
Core Quality Services
Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 18:37:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:32 UTC