W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > July 2012

RE: [NavigationTiming] Unclear note about "maintain the DOM structure of the document in memory"

From: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:39:16 +0000
To: "Boris Zbarsky (bzbarsky@mit.edu)" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AE5FFD9402CD4F4785E812F2C9929D650E3BB916@SN2PRD0310MB383.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
I believe the editor was trying to capture the scenario when traversing from a bfcache and not hitting the network, we shouldn't update the timing data for that page from when it had initially hit the network.

The definition of navigation, http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/single-page.html#navigate, which we are planning to reference in Navigation Timing, doesn't seem to explicitly call out session history traversal. Does this mean that if we use that definition of navigation, the bfcache scenario would be treated the same as document.open/.write/.close, which is that it does not impact Navigation Timing? If so, I think we can safely remove those sentences in Section 5.1.

Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2012 17:40:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:33 UTC