W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > February 2012

RE: Page Visibility privacy section

From: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:54:35 +0000
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
CC: "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>, Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>
Message-ID: <EE4C13A1D11CFA49A58343DE361B0B04137378FA@TK5EX14MBXC252.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
>This contradicts the various "must" requirements listed throughout the specification. They should probably become "should" 
>requirements instead if there are indeed valid reasons not to follow them. Or the valid reasons are to be explicitly listed while 
>making the requirement, but then you need to be exhaustive.

I have removed the following non-normative text from the Privacy section:

"A User Agent may provide a setting to disable the Page Visibility API that when set will ensure the hidden attribute is set to false and the visibilityState attribute is set to visible."

> I also noticed that "must" is inconsistently cased throughout the specification and that the non-normative introduction section 
>contains a "must" requirement.


Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 21:55:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:32 UTC