W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > February 2012

RE: Specifying window.performance.now()

From: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:31:29 +0000
To: Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
CC: James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>, "dmandelin@mozilla.com" <dmandelin@mozilla.com>
Message-ID: <EE4C13A1D11CFA49A58343DE361B0B0413715DB2@TK5EX14MBXC252.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
We spoke about specifying it in the High Resolution Time spec. I will have a draft of that spec available for next week's conference call. It aligns very closely with what James has described in his proposal: http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-July/032343.html.

Jatinder

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Gentilcore [mailto:tonyg@google.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 5:33 AM
To: public-web-perf@w3.org
Cc: James Robinson; dmandelin@mozilla.com
Subject: Specifying window.performance.now()

Last July, James Robinson proposed[1] window.performance.now() to the whatwg. We've talked about it several times in this group, but as far as I'm aware no one has created a draft spec yet.

WebKit is ready to move forward with an implementation[2] and David Mandelin informs me Mozilla is ready as well[3]. Just so those initial prefixed versions line up as much as possible, I think it makes sense to have a draft spec somewhere before we start landing. So my questions are:
1. Does it make sense to add it to this group's charter[4]?
2. If so, who would like to edit it? James?

-Tony

[1] http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-July/032343.html
[2] https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66684
[3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=539095#c29
[4] http://www.w3.org/2011/04/webperf
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 16:32:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 23 February 2012 16:32:22 GMT