Re: [PerformanceTimeline] Returning Navigation Timing attributes in High Resolution Time

Sounds good. Which spec will we put the new interface in?

Arvind

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:05 AM, James Simonsen <simonjam@chromium.org>wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm not clear on the final recommendation here. Are we saying that we
>> will add all navigation timing attributes (which as part of
>> PerformanceTiming interface) to PerformanceEntry interface (which would
>> mean removing some attributes from PerformanceResourceTiming interface)?
>>
>> Or would we create another object called PerformanceNavigationTiming
>> (similar to PerformanceResourceTiming) which extends from PerformanceEntry?
>>
>
> The latter. We'll create a new type with the extra members.
>
> James
>