W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > October 2011

RE: [ResourceTiming] some feedback

From: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 22:43:26 +0000
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EE4C13A1D11CFA49A58343DE361B0B040699BFE0@TK5EX14MBXC252.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Thanks for the feedback Anne. I agree with the changes you have suggested below and have opened ACTION 53 to update the spec.

Jatinder

-----Original Message-----
From: public-web-perf-request@w3.org [mailto:public-web-perf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 9:11 AM
To: public-web-perf@w3.org
Subject: [ResourceTiming] some feedback

Terms such as "browsing context" and "fetch" are not defined in the draft yet pretty much everything in the draft hinges on them. They should be defined.

New APIs should not use integer based constants. They should use simple string values (not exposed on the interface by the way). E.g.  
initiatorType == "svg" or some such. See XMLHttpRequest responseType as example or the various <canvas> 2D interface attributes.

When you talk about elements you need to say what kind of elements they are. E.g. "the HTML img element" or "the img element in the http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml namespace".


--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/



Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2011 22:43:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 5 October 2011 22:43:56 GMT