W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > March 2011

Re: [NavigationTiming] few comments

From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:47:18 +0200
Message-ID: <4D8A1606.2030305@helsinki.fi>
To: Zhiheng Wang <zhihengw@google.com>
CC: Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>, public-web-perf@w3.org, Nic Jansma <njansma@microsoft.com>
On 03/23/2011 08:39 AM, Zhiheng Wang wrote:
>    Instead of enumerating/predicting all the possible navigation
> types, TYPE_RESERVED
> is meant to be a catch-all type (to replace TYPE_OTHERS in the original
> draft) while we
> outline some of the common ones that are likely to be used in latency
> analysis. Some
> consistency is lost between edits.
>
>    I agree that we need to be more specific about the reloading cases
>
It is equally important to be more specific with script initiated
loading. Currently all the tests assume that
script initiated loads cause TYPE_NAVIGATE, but per the draft
the type should be TYPE_RESERVED.


-Olli
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 15:47:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:30 UTC