W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > March 2011

Re: [NavigationTiming] few comments

From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:47:18 +0200
Message-ID: <4D8A1606.2030305@helsinki.fi>
To: Zhiheng Wang <zhihengw@google.com>
CC: Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>, public-web-perf@w3.org, Nic Jansma <njansma@microsoft.com>
On 03/23/2011 08:39 AM, Zhiheng Wang wrote:
>    Instead of enumerating/predicting all the possible navigation
> is meant to be a catch-all type (to replace TYPE_OTHERS in the original
> draft) while we
> outline some of the common ones that are likely to be used in latency
> analysis. Some
> consistency is lost between edits.
>    I agree that we need to be more specific about the reloading cases
It is equally important to be more specific with script initiated
loading. Currently all the tests assume that
script initiated loads cause TYPE_NAVIGATE, but per the draft
the type should be TYPE_RESERVED.

Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 15:47:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:30 UTC