- From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:25:28 +0200
- To: Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>
- CC: public-web-perf@w3.org
On 03/20/2011 12:51 AM, Tony Gentilcore wrote: > But I agree the types are underspecified. My understanding is that > TYPE_RESERVED should never be returned. I'd support an update that > clarifies that form submissions and script initiated navigations fall > under TYPE_NAVIGATE. I'd also support removing TYPE_RESERVED > altogether. > Yeah, the spec needs to be fixed. I found some currently invalid tests http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/file/fb6cbccbb0cc/tests/approved/test_timing_client_redirect.htm http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/file/fb6cbccbb0cc/tests/submission/Microsoft/NavigationTiming/test_timing_attributes_order.htm Both expect TYPE_NAVIGATE to mean something else than what is currently specified. Once the spec is changed, I'd assume those test to be valid. -Olli
Received on Sunday, 20 March 2011 17:26:29 UTC