W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > March 2011

Re: review of Navigation Timing's use of Web IDL

From: Zhiheng Wang <zhihengw@google.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:16:53 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=MB2qU3-K0aPKEk4vOV0ynKtwYdhUWn+ut5c7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
   Yes, it tells what we want much better. I've updated the working draft.

thanks,
Zhiheng

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> > The way things are specced now something like:
> >
> > performance = "hi";
> >
> > Throws since "hi" isn't a Performance object. Instead the property
> > should be marked readonly and replaceable.
>
> Yep, that's the intent. Neither the Chrome or IE implementations throw
> on the above snippet, we just need to capture it properly in
> IDL-speak. Zhiheng, it sounds like we need to update it to
> readonly+replaceable?
>
Received on Friday, 18 March 2011 21:17:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:30 UTC