W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > April 2011

RE: [minutes] Web Performance WG F2F Meeting Agenda 2011-04-01

From: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:56:21 +0000
To: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EE4C13A1D11CFA49A58343DE361B0B040682F2F1@TK5EX14MBXC252.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Per discussion on the call today, there are no restrictions on the spec names.

Jatinder 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-web-perf-request@w3.org [mailto:public-web-perf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jatinder Mann
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 12:26 PM
To: Cameron McCormack; public-web-perf@w3.org
Subject: RE: [minutes] Web Performance WG F2F Meeting Agenda 2011-04-01

I'm not sure if the description of the specification in the charter constrains the name you can give to the spec. This is something Philippe or the chairs may be able to share more insight on.

Do you have a suggestion for the new spec title? You had mention "Timing control for script-based animations" as the title on the initial draft. We can discuss this a bit more on the call today at 2PM PST.

Jatinder Mann

-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron McCormack [mailto:cam@mcc.id.au]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 6:04 PM
To: Jatinder Mann; public-web-perf@w3.org
Subject: Re: [minutes] Web Performance WG F2F Meeting Agenda 2011-04-01

I wrote, earlier in the month:
> I am happier with that description of that specification, but I am 
> wondering if that name, “Display Paint Notifications”, is still 
> appropriate.  I hope that the name mentioned here does not constrain 
> us when choosing the actual specification’s name.

I see the new charter is out still with this name.  Can someone confirm for me that the use of this name in the charter doesn’t constrain us when we come to naming the actual specification?

--
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/


Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2011 21:56:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:30 UTC