W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > April 2011

Re: [minutes] 20110406 Web Performance WG Teleconference #27

From: Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:10:29 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTinwgVVm25KOrd_nPqRdkqdGmi3Lzg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nic Jansma <Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com>
Cc: Zhiheng Wang <zhihengw@google.com>, James Simonsen <simonjam@chromium.org>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
This validates that navigationStart is 0 after a cross-origin redirect.
Should we hold off on approving until we figure out that issue?

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Nic Jansma <Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com>wrote:

>  Yep, Karen is preparing some updates to validate the starting domain.
>
>
>
> - Nic
>
>
>
> *From:* Zhiheng Wang [mailto:zhihengw@google.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2011 12:00 PM
> *To:* James Simonsen
> *Cc:* Nic Jansma; public-web-perf@w3.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [minutes] 20110406 Web Performance WG Teleconference #27
>
>
>
>    The X-origin redirect test<http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/NavigationTiming/test_timing_xserver_redirect.htm>works fine on
> http://w3c-test.org but not http://www.w3c-test.org since
>
> the iframe destination is set to w3c-test.org. Shall we check the root
> document host name and set
>
> it in the redirect?
>
>
>
> cheers,
>
> Zhiheng
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:29 AM, James Simonsen <simonjam@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
> The new tests look good to me. Thanks!
>
>
>
> James
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Nic Jansma <Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> Great catch!  I updated test_timing_greater_than() to actually only test >,
> which is what we want.  We don't have anything actually testing >=.
>
>
>
> - Nic
>
>
>
> *From:* simonjam@google.com [mailto:simonjam@google.com] *On Behalf Of *James
> Simonsen
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:12 AM
> *To:* Nic Jansma
> *Cc:* public-web-perf@w3.org
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [minutes] 20110406 Web Performance WG Teleconference #27
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Nic Jansma <Nic.Jansma@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Microsoft/NavigationTiming/test_timing_server_redirect.htm
>
>
>
> test_timing_greater_than('navigationStart', 0);
>
>
>
> Despite its name, this is actually testing >=, so we're in the same boat if
> navigationStart is 0. I'd suggest renaming the helper function too, to
> better reflect what it's doing.
>
>
>
> James
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 20:11:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:30 UTC