W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > November 2010

Re: [NavigationTiming] Move window.performance to navigator.performance

From: Zhiheng Wang <zhihengw@google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:50:12 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikPhYq+P6kkNamGKJ6_Fxvp9X40++7nNmuOVrtE@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Bryan McQuade <bmcquade@google.com>, public-web-perf@w3.org
  So "pagePerformance" sounds good to everyone?

  Nic and Anderson found that 0.00993% of high traffic websites has
performance object in
their scripts. It might not cover all the cases, but I sort of subscribe to
the idea that these
developers should know about this draft, especially if they care about
"performance". };->
That said, using a rarer name helps.


cheers,
Zhiheng







On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:34:54 +0100, Bryan McQuade <bmcquade@google.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Agree that the property name performance is likely to collide with
> >> existing
> >> scripts. Maybe we need to choose a different less common name?
> >
> > That works for me. Any suggestions? "pagePerformance" doesn't come up
> much
> > in google code search.
>
> Sold!
>
> / Jonas
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 22:50:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 21 December 2010 18:13:56 GMT