W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > November 2010

Re: [NavigationTiming] a couple questions

From: Sylvain Hellegouarch <sh@defuze.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:20:37 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTinLtCHGm1iO6fMr0KV0JmdXO3tMZPfOkQJrczE1@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Zhiheng Wang <zhihengw@google.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>wrote:

> On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 07:11:25 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
> wrote:
>
>> One solution would be to stick it on the document object. Another to
>> come up with a more exotic name though I have to admit any good
>> suggestions escape me at the moment.
>>
>
> One idea I had was to put it on window.console if we are going to
> standardize parts of window.console anyway since the performance API is
> mostly for debugging and figuring out what is going on.
>
>

Most likely indeed. However, I was wondering if it would make sense to use
the performance API as a monitoring platform in production as well. It could
offer some interesting pieces of information. Mind you, I'm not familiar
with its impact on the resource processing itself.

-- 
- Sylvain
http://www.defuze.org
http://twitter.com/lawouach
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 10:21:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 21 December 2010 18:13:55 GMT