Re: Request for comments: Draft W3C Web of Things Interest Group Charter

You may find some useful clarifications in my Mindtrek 2014 talk on the 
Web of Things, see:

     http://www.w3.org/2014/11/05-dsr-wot.pdf
     http://www.mindtrek.org/2014/

This covers the range of platforms, opportunities for common APIs across 
them, and much more.

I am very much hoping that you will be able to participate in the 
Interest Group and help us in the discussions leading towards the 
deliverables identified in the charter.

Best regards,

     Dave

On 04/11/14 14:31, Ken Blackwell wrote:
> I've just finished reviewing the charter and I agree with Jonathan's points below, though I think the first point is already called out in the charter in 2.0 Survey of Existing Practices and Standards.
>
> I'm very involved in Dell's IoT strategy and what I'm taking away from this document is the need to clearly differentiate the interface boundaries between IoT and WoT.  In my mind, at least, they are not the same thing though they are very complimentary.
>
> There is a ton of effort going on right now across the industry to flesh out reference architectures for IoT.  They range from the very simple Thing connected directly via Ip to the internet to multi-tiered architectures with embedded command and control, aggregation layers, and device management and security.
>
> Seems to me one of the big problems that we need to take on is how WoT standards handle the range of IoT architectures being developed.  As an example, the simplest case is some JavaScript running in a browser doing inventory and data collection from Things connected directly to the Internet or local network.  There is very little stuff (practically nothing) in between.  The other extreme is a cloud-based repository of device asset/configuration information, metric store with analytics results, orchestration and workflow engine, etc.  In this world, device access is never going to be directly possible but instead it will go through multiple layers of cloud and probably on-premise services.
>
> So, as a Web developer, how can I write code once that will work in both environments?  Obviously this means abstracting the tiers (maybe 0, maybe dozens) through common programming interfaces such that my web app does not know or care how complex the IoT infrastructure is.  This means abstracting the security infrastructure as well.
>
> Happy to dig deeper if the above needs further explaination.
>
> Ken Blackwell
> Chief Architect, Systems Management | Office of the CTO
> Dell | Software Group
> Ken.Blackwell@software.dell.com
> Office: +1 203 664 1932
> Mobile: +1 203-733-5381
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 전종홍 [mailto:hollobit@etri.re.kr]
> Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2014 9:16 PM
> To: Dave Raggett; public-web-of-things@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Request for comments: Draft W3C Web of Things Interest Group Charter
>
> Dear All,
>
> How about to add these kind of tasks in the task part:
>   • Tracking and documenting Web technologies that are particularly relevant on IoT/WoT
>   • Definition of requirements that enable Web of Thing technologies to be used to enable the Small-constrained devices and Open Source Hardware.
>   • Definition of requirements that enable Web technologies to be used to enable Thing(or device) management.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> --- Jonathan Jeon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Raggett [mailto:dsr@w3.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 1:17 AM
> To: public-web-of-things@w3.org
> Subject: Request for comments: Draft W3C Web of Things Interest Group Charter
>
> This June we had the Workshop on the Web of Things in Berlin, see:
>
>      http://www.w3.org/2014/02/wot/
>
> The workshop report itself can be found at
> http://www.w3.org/2014/02/wot/report.html
>
> As an outcome of that workshop, we are preparing a charter for a Web of
> Things Interest Group, following the precedents of the Web & TV and Web
> & Mobile Interest Groups.  You can find the draft charter at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/09/wot-ig-charter.html
>
> We would like to hear from a wide range of stakeholders to clarify the
> mission and scope for the Interest Group, the target topics and industry
> priorities, and opportunities for liaisons with other related standards
> development organizations.  We will also be looking for people
> interested in championing particular aspects of work, e.g. as task force
> leaders, or as Interest Group Note editors. In the meantime, we welcome
> suggestions for task force topics.
>
> Please send comments and suggestions for changes to the charter to the
> public list <public-wot-charter@w3.org>, or you can send them to the W3C
> Staff Contact Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>.
>
> Many thanks for your help and looking forward to your comments.
>
> -- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
>

-- 
Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett

Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2014 21:07:34 UTC