- From: Jon Lee <jonlee@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:45:59 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Web Notification WG <public-web-notification@w3.org>, Ted O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com>
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 12:18 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > > Apparently you have still not been reading my comments. The WHATWG > supports both persistent and "toast-like" notifications (the latter > through new Notification()), but has removed a number of events. The > WHATWG has also simplified the processing model somewhat. > >> There were no objections by the members of the working group. To be formal about it, we have unanimity, which is stronger than consensus, and I have a hard time seeing what else to do other than respect the group’s unanimity here and declare consensus. > > Actually, you have to address substantive comments. Whether you > recognize them coming from members of your WG (which I thought were > organizations, not individuals) or as members of the public. I believe I have addressed your comments. Whatever incompatibilities there may be in the model between the more recent WHATWG spec and our spec, the W3C spec describes behavior currently shipping in browsers, and the WHATWG spec does not. As chair of the working group, I concluded to proceed with requesting transition to CR, and we already have a formal recording of this decision. I feel I gave ample opportunity for all participants in the working group to express agreement or disagreement with the proposal, and none have expressed disagreement. Therefore in terms of the W3C process, the request carries. Nonetheless, Anne, are you formally objecting to the working group’s decision to transition? Regards, Jon
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2015 16:46:30 UTC