W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-notification@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Rename replaceID attribute (was Feedback from Safari on Web Notifications)

From: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:46:51 -0700
Cc: Jon Lee <jonlee@apple.com>, public-web-notification@w3.org
Message-Id: <BB5FD092-8413-4624-9DD3-AC782CBF6FD6@gmail.com>
To: John Gregg <johnnyg@google.com>
Hey John,

Same behavior as currently spec wfm.

I do not mind just using the word 'id' or 'tag'.

Thanks!
Doug


On Mar 13, 2012, at 9:34 AM, John Gregg wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Jon Lee <jonlee@apple.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> The initial discussion based on Safari's feedback looked at one issue, but hasn't looked at the rest. To avoid confusion, I'm splitting out the other outstanding 3 points into separate threads.
> 
> To recap, the original proposal was to replace setReplaceId() with an attribute "id". John Gregg felt "id" suggested uniqueness, which is not true. I felt that "id" was the problem then, and suggested using "tag" to imply this common relationship between notifications. Thoughts?
> 
> Jon
> 
> No objection to changing the name "replaceID" to "tag", but I thought part of your proposal was also concerning the specified behavior of the "tag", i.e., specifying that the UA either in-place update or close and re-open the notification with the same (origin, tag).  
> 
> I would prefer to keep that specified behavior.
Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2012 16:47:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 17 December 2012 14:48:28 GMT