W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-notification@w3.org > July 2011

Re: Next steps for Web Notifications?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 12:12:35 +0200
To: "Web Notification WG" <public-web-notification@w3.org>, "Navarr Barnier" <navarr@gtaero.net>, "John Gregg" <johnnyg@google.com>
Message-ID: <op.vxxqm9nz64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:42:40 +0200, Navarr Barnier <navarr@gtaero.net>  
wrote:
> The spec defines a "web notification" as a notification with consisting  
> of web platform content such as HTML and SVG, where as our current "Web
> Notification" spec defines a "Simple Notification."

John, can we change this terminology to "notification" and "URL  
notification"? They are both proposals for notifications APIs for the web,  
so that would make more sense I think.


> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:21 PM, John Gregg <johnnyg@google.com> wrote:
>> Regarding Web Notifications, I think the plan is still to maintain a
>> separate track for that spec; having it mentioned in the definitions of  
>> the Notifications spec makes sense to me for context.  If the group is  
>> still
>> interested in pursuing it, we could separately try to resolve the  
>> various points of contention and get that ready for a first public  
>> working draft.
>
> I support this.  I think URL Notifications are important for more complex
> data from web-based applications and platforms.  I think I've emailed the
> list before with a couple use-cases that would make sense for URL
> Notifications.

I have no problem with publishing a draft to seek more feedback, though  
admittedly this did not work great so far with the Web Notifications draft.


Another thing we should look at is the permissions API. Per  
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-notification/2010Nov/0001.html  
the DAP WG was going to take this over, but nothing much has happened in  
that group thus far. Maybe we should publish a draft.


Publishing Web Notifications as Last Call is for now delayed until John  
addresses the comments raised by Ian. I hope that is not controversial :-)

Kind regards,


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 1 July 2011 10:13:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 17 December 2012 14:48:28 GMT