W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-notification@w3.org > October 2010

Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Notification drafts

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:26:26 +0200
Cc: "Web Notification WG" <public-web-notification@w3.org>
To: "Doug Turner" <dougt@dougt.org>
Message-ID: <op.vkr5acg764w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
Hi Doug,

Thanks for the quick reply!

On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 06:56:47 +0200, Doug Turner <dougt@dougt.org> wrote:
> I just skimmed the api. Here are my comments.  I'd like them discussed  
> and have these issues tracked and resolved before moving to FPWD.

That is somewhat unfortunate as that will most likely take more time than  
we have. You realize nothing is endorsed if we publish and that a First  
Public Working Draft is much different from a Last Call Working Draft?  
I.e. the drafts will most certainly change in details and not all the  
drafts will have to advance at the same rate.

We technically do not need consensus for publication, but I am not sure if  
I want to make use of that ability.


As for tracking issues. We could use Bugzilla I suppose, but I would  
prefer just using the mailing list. If people feel things are falling  
between the cracks we should probably start doing this more formally.


>>  Web URL Notifications
>>  http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebNotifications/publish/WebNotifications.html
>
> I think this is basically out of the scope of our charter as I read it  
> and it is something I think Mozilla will *not* implement.

I will ask the W3C Team to comment on this.

As a general note, if features end up not being implemented they will have  
to be dropped from the specification. We cannot advance a specification of  
which the features are not implemented or are only implemented in one  
implementation.

Cheers,


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 16:27:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 17 December 2012 14:48:27 GMT