W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-notification@w3.org > October 2010

Re: Publishing Web Notification Drafts

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:58:36 +0200
To: "John Gregg" <johnnyg@google.com>
Cc: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Drew Wilson" <atwilson@google.com>, "Doug Turner" <dougt@dougt.org>, "Web Notification WG" <public-web-notification@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vkl8vycf64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:29:09 +0200, John Gregg <johnnyg@google.com> wrote:
> I believe that is generally seen as a shortcoming, not something to be
> used as a model, considering
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html-bidi/#script-dialog

Yeah, my thinking was that Unicode would be sufficient. If that is  
generally considered too hard to use I suppose having a dir attribute  
makes sense.

I was wondering about something else, how was it decided which attributes  
are part of the constructor and which are part of the object? dir and  
replaceId would make a lot of sense on the constructor too.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 12:29:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 17 December 2012 14:48:27 GMT