W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-notification@w3.org > October 2010

Re: Publishing Web Notification Drafts

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:03:53 +0200
To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Drew Wilson" <atwilson@google.com>
Cc: "Doug Turner" <dougt@dougt.org>, "John Gregg" <johnnyg@google.com>, "Web Notification WG" <public-web-notification@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vki50qgy64w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:25:03 +0200, Drew Wilson <atwilson@google.com>  
> I'd be concerned about excluding support for rtl locales merely because  
> some lowest-common-denominator system platform does not support it, but  
> I'm
> optimistic we can come up with some sort of solution that minimizes
> incompatibility. Is there a problem with just stating that the rtl  
> attribute may not be supported (i.e. ignored) on all system platforms?  
> In practice, if a user installs a platform that does not support rtl  
> notifications, then I'm hard-pressed to expect they'll be confused when  
> that platform doesn't
> display rtl notifications.

We don't have LTR/RTL indicators for alert() etc. Why are they needed here?

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2010 20:04:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:53:13 UTC