Rationale? Re: General objection regarding Web NFC

Hi Guys,

Just in order to get this discussion in a better shape, would it be possible
getting a rationale for the fact that your work assumes that the connecting
client device is based on Web technology?

It is clearly an omission from the charter and use-case documents.

Cheers,
Anders

On 2015-04-14 13:41, Anders Rundgren wrote:
> When I read issues like https://github.com/w3c/web-nfc/issues/16
> I get the impression that you expect connecting clients to use Web-technology.
>
> IMO, this assumption will severely limit the value of Web NFC.
> The only "standard" that's really lacking, is a way for untrusted Web-pages to interact with connecting client devices.
> http://ipt.intel.com/Home/How-it-works/network-security-identity-management/ipt-with-near-field-communications
>
> How Web-based OSes expose NFC to the outer world should IMO be left to another forum to cater for including
> security considerations.
>
> Cheers,
> Anders
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2015 03:10:41 UTC