- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:20:28 +0000
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: public-web-mobile@w3.org
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > But rather than pressuring to reach a certain arbitrary profile (as in > "you must support the letter of the standard as it was on this > particular date") of technologies, should the pressure not be driven by > use cases and by whatever the latest development of a particular aspect > of the standard is instead? Unless we plan on keeping the profiles > continually updated to reflect the very latest developments (and then > start numbering them, as otherwise a browser that "satisfies" CoreMob > one day may all of a sudden not satisfy it). Yes, this is exactly what I argued in WAC too. The conformance should be based on the ability to run a range of real-world applications interoperably, not on a random lists of specs. -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2014 20:19:38 UTC