Re: [webintents] Should DAP revisit WebIntents?

+1

we have the TF, the list and the IPR obligations of the joint TF. I suggest we simply use the (awakening) Web Intents task force unless there is an unstated motivation.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
@fjhirsch



On Jun 24, 2014, at 11:54 AM, ext Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote:

> On 24/06/2014 17:52 , Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> Perhaps churn on it in a Community Group and then IFF there are two
>> implementations, then move it to a Working Group?
> 
> This sounds to me like it's just pushing things around for no good purpose (but perhaps you have a motivation in mind which you didn't list!)
> 
> I think we have this list, we can work with that.
> 
> -- 
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
> 

Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2014 16:21:32 UTC