Re: Web Intents based APIs

The original thought was that the url in the action SHOULD point to the
detailed documetation/specification for the usage of that action and data.

I think we all strongly agree that they should be specified and documented
much more comprehensively than they have now under "webintents.org/*"

My question is for all types that are under the namespace
http://webintents.org/ do you want the process to be managed by the W3C
under this group? or outside?

P

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:30 PM, KOMATSU Kensaku
<kensaku.komatsu@gmail.com>wrote:

> Claes,
>
> I like your idea considering the standardization process for specific
> combinations. I also agree that to make
> interoperability better your proposal will be helpful.
>
> I want to clarify your idea. My opinion is that some combinations such as
> Gallery or Contacts should
> be standardized but everything should not be. I think there should be
> sandbox spaces for some
> Action and Types pair (and it should be documented in schema url). Anyway,
> to list the candidates for
> it is nice idea, I presume. It'll be helpful for developers who want to
> make use of WebIntents.
>
> 2012/6/2 Nilsson, Claes1 <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com>
>
> Hi,****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> To achieve interoperability between Client applications and Service
>> applications Web Intents based APIs need to be specified. I assume that the
>> combination of Action and Type enables a specified API to be used for
>> interaction between Client and Service. So this has to be standardized.**
>> **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> It seems that this is an area where still a lot have to be done.  I have
>> only seen one tangible proposal for a Web Intents based API submitted to
>> W3C, that is the Gallery API,
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/16185b62381d/gallery/index.html.
>> Robin has also posted thoughts on a Web Intents based Contacts API,
>> http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebIntents/ContactsAPI.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I wonder if people on this list know of more tangible proposals for Web
>> Intents based APIs than the two mentioned above? Which are your thoughts on
>> driving the standardization on Web Intents based API further?****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> This is essential in order to succeed with Web Intents.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Best regards****
>>
>>   Claes****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> [image: cid:3333625383_1036728]
>>
>> *Claes Nilsson M.Sc.E.E*
>> Master Engineer, Research
>> Technology Research - Advanced Application Lab
>> *
>> Sony Mobile Communications*
>>  Phone:  +46 10 80 15178
>> Mobile: +46 705 56 68 78
>> Switchboard: +46 10 80 00000
>> E-Mail:* **mailto:claes1.nilsson@sonymobile.com<claes1.nilsson@sonyericsson.com>
>> *
>> Visiting Address; Nya Vattentornet
>> SE-221 88 LUND,
>> Sweden ****
>>
>> *Disclaimer:
>> *The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the named recipient(s) and access to
>> this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. The views are those of the
>> sender and not necessarily the views of Sony Ericsson and Sony Ericsson
>> accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever or howsoever arising in
>> connection with this e-mail.Any attachment(s) to this message has been
>> checked for viruses, but please rely on your own virus checker and
>> procedures. If you contact us by e-mail, we will store your name and
>> address to facilitate communications. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, please inform the sender by replying this transmission and
>> delete the e-mail and any copies of it without disclosing it.****
>>
>>  ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>
>


-- 
Paul Kinlan
Developer Advocate @ Google for Chrome and HTML5
G+: http://plus.ly/paul.kinlan
t: +447730517944
tw: @Paul_Kinlan
LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/paulkinlan
Blog: http://paul.kinlan.me
Skype: paul.kinlan