- From: Jean-Claude Dufourd <jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:40:35 +0200
- To: Greg Billock <gbillock@google.com>
- CC: "public-web-intents@w3.org" <public-web-intents@w3.org>
On 18/6/12 21:21 , Greg Billock wrote: >> JCD: The additional APIs in my rewrite are not meant to be accessible to the >> pages. >> They are meant to be usable only by a browser extension. >> Sorry about not making that clearer. > No worries. I agree with you that an extension mechanism around > intents is very useful. (But I'm biased that way. :-)) Perhaps this > belongs in the best practices section, though, instead of section 4? > (That is, a non-normative section describing the extension > functionality that UAs should expose -- they will have different > trade-offs to make in terms of the overall extension API and how they > all work together; I don't think we should require a particular > extension API method signature or interaction style.) JCD: I could live with the extension mechanism being in the best practices section, if there was one such section :) Best regards JC > -- JC Dufourd Directeur d'Etudes/Professor Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group Traitement du Signal et Images/Signal and Image Processing Telecom ParisTech, 37-39 rue Dareau, 75014 Paris, France Tel: +33145817733 - Mob: +33677843843 - Fax: +33145817144
Received on Monday, 16 July 2012 11:41:01 UTC