W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-intents@w3.org > July 2012

Re: rewrite of section 4

From: Jean-Claude Dufourd <jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:40:35 +0200
Message-ID: <5003FDB3.6050800@telecom-paristech.fr>
To: Greg Billock <gbillock@google.com>
CC: "public-web-intents@w3.org" <public-web-intents@w3.org>

On 18/6/12 21:21 , Greg Billock wrote:
>> JCD: The additional APIs in my rewrite are not meant to be accessible to the
>> pages.
>> They are meant to be usable only by a browser extension.
>> Sorry about not making that clearer.
> No worries. I agree with you that an extension mechanism around
> intents is very useful. (But I'm biased that way. :-)) Perhaps this
> belongs in the best practices section, though, instead of section 4?
> (That is, a non-normative section describing the extension
> functionality that UAs should expose -- they will have different
> trade-offs to make in terms of the overall extension API and how they
> all work together; I don't think we should require a particular
> extension API method signature or interaction style.)
JCD: I could live with the extension mechanism being in the best 
practices section, if there was one such section :)
Best regards
JC

>


-- 
JC Dufourd
Directeur d'Etudes/Professor
Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group
Traitement du Signal et Images/Signal and Image Processing
Telecom ParisTech, 37-39 rue Dareau, 75014 Paris, France
Tel: +33145817733 - Mob: +33677843843 - Fax: +33145817144
Received on Monday, 16 July 2012 11:41:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 July 2012 11:41:01 GMT