Re: A simpler, webbier approach to Web Intents?

Thanks for the links; we've been reading through the posts.

One of the design goals of Web Intents was to eventually replace the
functionality of RPH/RCH in a simpler, more intuitive fashion.  This also
means eventually deprecating those methods to have a consistent API.

I've been gathering my notes preparing to write up our proposal for
deprecating RPH/RCH which I'll send to WhatWG and this list at the same
time (WhatWG since it deals with deprecating a method from that domain).
 I'll send the proposal out Monday.

Thanks,
James

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Mark Hammond <skippy.hammond@gmail.com>wrote:

> FYI, Ben Adida from Mozilla has just put up a blog post with some thoughts
> on simplifying web intents [1].
>
> It raises some interesting points that seem worthy of consideration and
> discussion by this taskforce.  Of particular note, it makes reference to a
> back-of-the-envelope proposal by Hixie [2] and also touches on an RPH
> approach that sounds quite similar to Rich Tibbett's proposal [3]  -
> although I must admit I don't quite follow all the details in that latter
> proposal.
>
> [1] http://benlog.com/articles/**2012/02/09/a-simpler-webbier-**
> approach-to-web-intents-or-**activities/<http://benlog.com/articles/2012/02/09/a-simpler-webbier-approach-to-web-intents-or-activities/>
>
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-webapps/**
> 2011JulSep/1509.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/1509.html>
>
> [3] http://richtr.tumblr.com/post/**12929135260/a-better-model-**
> for-web-intents<http://richtr.tumblr.com/post/12929135260/a-better-model-for-web-intents>
>
> Mark
>
>
>