W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-intents@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Specifying passed and return types

From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:04:43 -0500
Message-ID: <CAACrNNcJB+JXeo9wZ71qMXyY8dDFb=wxf1svifEhD2Ut=okwVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: WebIntents <public-web-intents@w3.org>
Greg wrote:
> 1. The "action" and "type" fields of an intent should be opaque strings as
> regards the API.

seems reasonable

> 2. What a service (Partner) can expect in the "data" field of the intent is
> governed as a function of the "type" exclusively.

seems reasonable

> 3. What data the client should expect in return from a particular intent is a
> more complex function, but a function strictly of inputs. However, it is not
> strictly a function of the "type" field, but is instead a function of
> the "action," "type," and possibly of parts of the "data" field as well.

seems reasonable
Received on Friday, 23 December 2011 01:05:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:14:45 UTC