W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-http-desc@w3.org > June 2006

Re: Use Cases

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:11:16 -0700
Message-Id: <B1B340B0-7062-4D35-9265-38D5E07BDC1E@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>, "Jan Algermissen" <jalgermissen@topicmapping.com>, "Paul Denning" <pauld@mitre.org>, public-web-http-desc@w3.org
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>

I'm finding that my biggest use case for a Web description format (at  
the risk of repeating myself) is at design time; architects and  
developers need something that encourages them to think in terms of  
stateful resources, and a common documentation format is immensely  
helpful.

There are other cases -- e.g., generating stubs, hinting  
configuration, etc., but I think that's the big one.


On 2006/06/08, at 7:18 PM, Mark Baker wrote:

> I think that's part of what we're trying to determine.  Having built a
> handful of machine-to-machine Web based systems, none of which needed
> a "description language" (nor would they have benefitted from one,
> IMO), I'm skeptical that there's a big enough problem here that
> requires a new standard (rather than reusing, say, XForms).  But I'm
> happy to be convinced otherwise.

--
Mark Nottingham
mnot@yahoo-inc.com
Received on Friday, 9 June 2006 17:12:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:11 GMT