On Aug 31, 2006, at 1:02 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > As I've said before, my primary use cases for WADL (and other desc > formats) are > a) as a design-time aid > b) for documentation generation > c) for server and intermediary configuration > and possibly also for stub generation on the server side. > > Talking to folks about this, I'm starting to wonder if there are > *any* good use cases for sharing your Web description with clients, > because doing so risks engendering tight coupling. I always thought of WADL as kind of "The .h file for my Web app". I think the rewards outweigh the risks. -TimReceived on Thursday, 31 August 2006 22:29:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:11 GMT