Do you mean in the service URIs themselves, or in the revision links? On 2006/04/28, at 12:02 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 13:12 -0700, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> <resource introduced="/revision/1"> >> <method name="GET"> >> ... >> </method> >> <method name="POST" introduced="/revision/2"> >> ... >> </method> >> </resource> > > Wouldn't you be able to resolve your use case by using dated links > and a > latest version link? Or is it important for you to follow the trail of > revisions (ie you would need a "previous version" link). > > Philippe > -- Mark Nottingham mnot@yahoo-inc.comReceived on Friday, 28 April 2006 20:01:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:11 GMT