W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-http-desc@w3.org > April 2006

Re: Service Versioning

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:30:10 -0700
Message-Id: <EBBF5551-7CDB-4E3C-974F-E0599720EFC8@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: public-web-http-desc@w3.org
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>

Do you mean in the service URIs themselves, or in the revision links?


On 2006/04/28, at 12:02 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:

> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 13:12 -0700, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> <resource introduced="/revision/1">
>>     <method name="GET">
>>       ...
>>     </method>
>>     <method name="POST" introduced="/revision/2">
>>       ...
>>     </method>
>> </resource>
>
> Wouldn't you be able to resolve your use case by using dated links  
> and a
> latest version link? Or is it important for you to follow the trail of
> revisions (ie you would need a "previous version" link).
>
> Philippe
>

--
Mark Nottingham
mnot@yahoo-inc.com
Received on Friday, 28 April 2006 20:01:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:11 GMT