W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-http-desc@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Caveats for Web-friendly service description

From: Jan Algermissen <jalgermissen@topicmapping.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 22:26:59 +0200
Message-Id: <69E4F2AE-072A-450E-9CFF-80A235E4E6F5@topicmapping.com>
Cc: public-web-http-desc@w3.org
To: Jan Algermissen <jalgermissen@topicmapping.com>

On Jun 1, 2005, at 9:41 PM, Jan Algermissen wrote:

> and each allowed transition is a combination of HTTP method and a  
> definition of what may
> be sent as a message body (aka form)


I have allways wanted to ask you what you would think about adding a  
means to express
'accepted RDF schemas' to RDF forms but also felt that that was  
somehow missing the
point. I just realized that I would actually need some way of  
specifying accepted
RDF graphs (e.g. via patterns[1]) to use RDF forms for what I have in  
mind. What are
your feelings about such an addition?


[1] and with a way to say allow-to-add-this or allow-to-delete-this

Jan Algermissen, Consultant & Programmer                              
Tugboat Consulting, 'Applying Web technology to enterprise IT'        
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2005 20:27:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:47:19 UTC