W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-http-desc@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Caveats for Web-friendly service description

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 10:29:26 -0700
To: Leigh Dodds <leigh@ldodds.com>
Cc: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, public-web-http-desc@w3.org
Message-id: <67BFA151-881B-4EC4-9247-FF690C85E329@textuality.com>

On Jun 1, 2005, at 7:48 AM, Leigh Dodds wrote:

> Can I suggest that a requirement for a service description format
> ought to allow for both RDF and XML as representation formats?

Why?  The cost of supporting two completely incompatible  
representation formats is high, so the corresponding benefit would  
have to be high too. -Tim

Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2005 17:29:33 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Danny Ayers: "Re: Caveats for Web-friendly service description"
Previous message: Joe Gregorio: "Re: Caveats for Web-friendly service description"
In reply to: Leigh Dodds: "Re: Caveats for Web-friendly service description"
Next in thread: Danny Ayers: "Re: Caveats for Web-friendly service description"
Reply: Danny Ayers: "Re: Caveats for Web-friendly service description"
Reply: Leigh Dodds: "Re: Caveats for Web-friendly service description"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:11 GMT