Re: [Cloud Browser] Technology Pitch Chapter

Thank you, Alexandra. I believe it would be a “thin-client” approach.

One more item: I’m concerned with 360-video at the moment, since I am involved in creating environments. As such, a 2D stream is understandable, but not necessarily applicable to a client that requires a culling camera.

I propose a buffer zone -  holding less-resolute environment data based on UI paths For example, Facebook renders a “skybox” by sending only specific streams to a user based on the faces of the box they are viewing. With a head-mounted display, it is quite jarring to experience “lag” when shifting perspectives. I understand this is a niche use-case for the moment, but it is indeed an extremely important factor for immersive media consumption. 

Regards
Jacob

 <http://vusionvr.com/>
Jacob Friedman

Co-Founder, Chief Creative Officer
jfriedman@vusionvr.com <mailto:jfriedman@vusionvr.com>
www.vusionvr.com <http://www.vusionvr.com/> | 642 King Street West, Suite 414, Toronto, ON, M5V 1M7 <https://www.google.ca/maps/place/642+King+St+W,+Toronto,+ON+M5V+1M7/@43.6443295,-79.403677,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x882b34de482aa6cf:0x8943a141e006de77>
 <https://www.facebook.com/VusionVR>    <http://www.twitter.com/VusionVR>    <https://plus.google.com/113143681799538444171/posts>    <https://www.linkedin.com/company/vusionvr>
LEGAL NOTICE: This transmission may contain privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized distribution, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this transmission or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, if you receive this transmission in error or if it is forwarded to you without the express authorization of VusionVR Inc., please destroy this transmission and contact us immediately.


> On May 10, 2016, at 12:18 PM, <Alexandra.Mikityuk@telekom.de> <Alexandra.Mikityuk@telekom.de> wrote:
> 
> Dear Jacob, 
>  
> This is a technology pitch, where we do not go into details.
> However, I have updated the figure accordingly, will that be OK? See [1].
>  
> The group first aims to put the API requirements together. Therefore, for the moment we do not decide how to integrate certain features. We have a dedicated accessibility Use Case for that matter in [2].
> Will that be possible that somebody from the accessibility group will give us a hand and provide a first input for the accessibility Use Case? 
>  
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/Architecture#Technology_Pitch <https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/Architecture#Technology_Pitch>
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/UseCases <https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/UseCases>
>  
>  
> From: Jacob Friedman [mailto:jfriedman@vusionvr.com <mailto:jfriedman@vusionvr.com>] 
> Sent: Dienstag, 10. Mai 2016 16:37
> To: Mikityuk, Alexandra
> Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org <mailto:public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: [Cloud Browser] Technology Pitch Chapter
>  
> Forgive me, but how would this be integrated with accessibility standards?
>  
> Cheers
> Jacob
>  
> 
> On May 10, 2016, at 9:41 AM, <Alexandra.Mikityuk@telekom.de <mailto:Alexandra.Mikityuk@telekom.de>> <Alexandra.Mikityuk@telekom.de <mailto:Alexandra.Mikityuk@telekom.de>> wrote:
>  
> Dear all,
>  
> during our last call we have identified a missing part in our architecture description – a short technology pitch. See the corresponding action [1]. I have provided the first draft for the pitch, please see the corresponding chapter [2].
>  
> Waiting for your comments!
>  
>  
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/actions/232 <https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/actions/232>
> [2] https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/Architecture#Technology_Pitch <https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Main_Page/Cloud_Browser_TF/Architecture#Technology_Pitch>