Re: New User Discovery Use Case

Giuseppe

The gaps will be identified through our discussions hopefully.

Glenn
--------
Sent from my cell, please forgive the typos

On Mar 24, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com<mailto:giuseppep@opera.com>> wrote:

Hi Bill,
thanks for your contribution. A minor (editorial) comment: it might be useful to cross link the UCs, to make it easy to follow. E.g. see how I did the link here

https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/GGIE_TF/UseCases/User_Discovery#Extends

you could do the same for the other references to UC1b

Glenn, Bill, (all)
I see that the gaps section for most of the UCs says "None known". I guess this is just a placeholder waiting for the upcoming discussion on "what are we missing" right? Because at the end of the day that's the main point of this exercise.

/g

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Bill Rose <brose@wjrconsulting.com<mailto:brose@wjrconsulting.com>> wrote:
Resending - My appologies if you get 2 copies of this. I had not set my permissions to post W3C message archives. - Bill

I posted a Use Case for GGIE User Discovery at https://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/GGIE_TF/UseCases/User_Discovery to get the discussion started on this subject. Its an extension to Streaming UC-1b adding client information to the search criteria. As I am new to this feel free to edit, comment, make suggestions - including that it does not belong here, or whatever. Also, feel free to post new User Discovery Use Cases or discussion topics.

Bill Rose
WJR Consulting Inc.
Office: (860) 313 8098<tel:%28860%29%20313%208098>
Cell: (860) 794 3846<tel:%28860%29%20794%203846>

Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2015 17:15:03 UTC