W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-and-tv@w3.org > May 2013

Re: [testing] Combining two browser synchronization use cases

From: Clarke Stevens <C.Stevens@CableLabs.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 12:37:38 +0000
To: "Ng, Sheau (NBCUniversal)" <Sheau.Ng@nbcuni.com>, "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CDB0F2C5.1C13B%c.stevens@cablelabs.com>
Sheau,

The team felt the two use cases had several similarities and suggested that they might be combined into a single use case. Of course, they are your use cases and you may disagree. So we would like you to either combine them into a single use case (if that makes sense), or be more explicit about the differences (as they pertain to requirements on the testing framework). You could create a new issue, but it might be easier to just combine things into one of the existing issues. It's really up to you. If you ask yourself, "How does this use case change the requirements on the testing framework?" I think you're solution will be fine.

And yes, I think the group felt that the use case(s) would be approved as they put a timing requirement on the testing framework.

Thanks,
-Clarke

From: <Ng>, "Sheau (NBCUniversal)" <Sheau.Ng@nbcuni.com<mailto:Sheau.Ng@nbcuni.com>>
Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 5:49 PM
To: Clarke Stevens <c.stevens@cablelabs.com<mailto:c.stevens@cablelabs.com>>, "public-web-and-tv@w3.org<mailto:public-web-and-tv@w3.org>" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org<mailto:public-web-and-tv@w3.org>>
Subject: [testing] Combining two browser synchronization use cases
Resent-From: <public-web-and-tv@w3.org<mailto:public-web-and-tv@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 5:49 PM

Clarke,
I apologize for not attending yesterday's meeting due to unavoidable schedule conflict

I meant to seek clarification on my action point to combine the two use cases that I submitted previously. Was the intent of the group that I combine the two browser sync use cases (Issue 67 and Issue 69) and re-submit as a new use case, or simply ignore one, and modify the other existing one to incorporate text from the second use case?

webtv-ISSUE-67: Synchronization Across Browsers
http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/issues/67

webtv-ISSUE-69: Switching of streams across browsers
http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/issues/69


Secondly, was there a conclusion when last discussed by the group that both use cases are appropriate and once combined into a single use case, would be considered "approved" by the group?

Once I have answers to these two, I will take action accordingly.

Thanks!

--
Sheau Ng | NBCUniversal | P: +1.609.759.0819
Received on Thursday, 9 May 2013 12:38:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:44:09 UTC