Re: TTV 1.0.0 Alpha 1 Release

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Michael Dolan <mdolan@newtbt.com> wrote:

> Glenn-****
>
> ** **
>
> I assume this is for the full profile?  Any plans for the other
> W3C-defined profiles (transformation, presentation, & sdp-us)?
>

This covers all TTML10 features. Since the 3 standard TTML profiles don't
place any constraints on the presence of features, then there is no
difference in processing. However, I have opened an enhancement issue [1]
to optionally warn of the use of a feature for which support is not
required by the profile.

[1] https://github.com/skynav/ttv/issues/21

An SDP-US profile document can also be verified, but the current (default)
ttml10 model doesn't attempt to test the additional SDP-US constraints.
I've opened a second enhancement feature [2] to add a 'ttml10-sdp-us'
verification model to test such constraints.

[2] https://github.com/skynav/ttv/issues/22


> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
>                 Mike****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Glenn Adams [mailto:glenn@skynav.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, July 08, 2013 6:49 PM
> *To:* public-tt
> *Cc:* W3C Web and TV
> *Subject:* TTV 1.0.0 Alpha 1 Release****
>
> ** **
>
> The first (functional complete) alpha release of TTV (Timed Text Verifier)
> 1.0.0 is now available at [1]. Prebuilt binary and source JAR artifacts are
> available at [2].****
>
> ** **
>
> Included in this release are 268 new test files [3] used to test
> non-well-formed, invalid, and valid constructs according to TTML1.0 (2nd
> Edition) [4].****
>
> ** **
>
> TTV is being made available under a BSD style license with unrestricted
> rights to use, modify, or derive further works. Furthermore, the author is
> not aware of any patent that reads on this work.****
>
> ** **
>
> See [5] in order to report any issue or feature enhancement request. A
> number of additional "lint" type enhancements are already open, beyond
> those already implemented as optional warnings, i.e., warnings not enabled
> by default.****
>
> ** **
>
> At present, we believe that all invalid constructs, both syntactic and
> semantic, are adequately tested; however, if you should discover any you
> believe are not covered, then please open a new issue at [5].****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> Glenn****
>
> ** **
>
> [1] https://github.com/skynav/ttv/tree/ttv-1.0.0a1****
>
> [2] https://github.com/skynav/ttv/tree/ttv-1.0.0a1/dst****
>
> [3]
> https://github.com/skynav/ttv/tree/ttv-1.0.0a1/tst/resources/com/skynav/ttv/app
> ****
>
> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PER-ttaf1-dfxp-20130709/****
>
> [5] https://github.com/skynav/ttv/issues?state=open****
>