[testing] minutes - 3 April 2013

available at:
  http://www.w3.org/2013/04/03-webtv-minutes.html

also as text below.

Thanks,

Kazuyuki

---
    [1]W3C

       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                - DRAFT -

                          web and tv testing tf

03 Apr 2013

    [2]Agenda

       [2] 
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-web-and-tv/2013Apr/0001.html

    See also: [3]IRC log

       [3] http://www.w3.org/2013/04/03-webtv-irc

Attendees

    Present
           Kazuyuki, Giuseppe, Clarke, Bin, Bryan, Yosuke,
           +1.514.461.aacc

    Regrets
    Chair
           Clarke

    Scribe
           Kaz

Contents

      * [4]Topics
          1. [5]liaison letter
          2. [6]use cases
      * [7]Summary of Action Items
      __________________________________________________________

liaison letter

    clarke: sent out an updated version
    ... and got comments from Giuseppe
    ... removing coremob
    ... any other comments on this?

    <giuseppep> the table is here:
    [8]http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Testing/Feature_Coverage_T
    able

       [8] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Testing/Feature_Coverage_Table

    clarke: if no comments, Giuseppe should go ahead and send it
    out

    giuseppe: you can update the text and send it to me
    ... and I can send it out

    clarke: will do

    bryan: do we need to add OMA for BCAST?

    clarke: good

    <giuseppep> the list is here:
    [9]http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Testing#Resources

       [9] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Testing#Resources

    clarke: do you want to be the contact person?

    bryan: Mohamed from Orange would be a good starting point

    clarke: any other suggestions?

    (none)

    clarke: Giuseppe suggested a poll

    giuseppe: involve Web&TV members organizations by asking their
    opinions

    clarke: my suggestion is using wiki and ask people to fill in

    giuseppe: we can use the questionnaire system of W3C
    ... need to talk with the systeam
    ... and kaz could help

    <scribe> ACTION: giuseppe to work with kaz to create an online
    poll [recorded in
    [10]http://www.w3.org/2013/04/03-webtv-minutes.html#action01]

    <trackbot> Created ACTION-107 - Work with kaz to create an
    online poll [on Giuseppe Pascale - due 2013-04-10].

    clarke: any questions?

    (none)

use cases

    -> [11]http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Testing#Use_Cases tf
    wiki

      [11] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Testing#Use_Cases

    giueppe: some work by Orange on benchmark
    ... something else we can look at
    ... will do it

    clarke: three new use cases added by Bin

    (ISSUE-62, ISSUE-63, ISSUE-64)

    giuseppe: trying to understand why these three items were
    listed as use cases
    ... these specs (EME, etc.) are important
    ... do we want to list them as use cases?
    ... what would be the best way?

    clarke: requirement document is our delivelable
    ... requirements for testing ecosystem
    ... testing features, etc.

    <Zakim> bryan, you wanted to clarify that we were trying to
    figure out what the point of the use cases were, by offering
    some

    bryan: my suggestion is focusing on features
    ... organizing test framework is handled by the testing wiki
    organized by Tobie
    ... at least CoreMob has decided to hand off testing topics to
    the Testing TF

    giuseppe: the plan is not running this TF for years
    ... bringing our requirements to the testing wiki
    ... after our having discussion on our own requirements, we can
    join them

    bryan: we can put ides on the table

    <giuseppep>
    [12]http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Testing#The_Web_.26_TV_Te
    sting_task_force_will_do_the_following:

      [12] 
http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Testing#The_Web_.26_TV_Testing_task_force_will_do_the_following:

    clarke: testing features beyond what we've done or the testing
    initiative would be useful

    giuseppe: if you see the above link on "what the TV testing TF
    do"
    ... there is description on what will be done
    ... input from industry

    <bryan> so would you consider the use cases created by the
    other TF's in a similar vein

    bryan: you got a use case here
    ... e.g., tablet-based TV

    <giuseppep>
    [13]http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Testing/Web_%26_TV_Testin
    g_Discussions#Candidate_Use_Cases

      [13] 
http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Testing/Web_%26_TV_Testing_Discussions#Candidate_Use_Cases

    bryan: which web&tv technology would be used?

    giuseppe: correcting priority would be what we should do

    clarke: we've got service discovery use case
    ... individual use case would be added to requirements for
    testing framework

    giuseppe: use cases which have impact for testing framework
    ... if those use cases highlight issues of the testing
    framework, it would be great

    <bryan> so it would be helpful for the "will do the following"
    part of the wiki to clarify what the use cases will focus on

    giuseppe: benchmarking may need additional api

    bryan: use cases drives the discussion on testing framework.
    right?
    ... it would be better to add some clarification
    ... on what the use cases will focus on

    clarke: do you want to add some text?

    giuseppe: adding some high level bullet

    clarke: we're specifically searching for requirements for the
    testing framework

    <bryan> sorry for the confusion, I think at least for us the
    intent is clear now

    <scribe> ACTION: clarke to add clarification on what use cases
    for testing tf focus on [recorded in
    [14]http://www.w3.org/2013/04/03-webtv-minutes.html#action02]

    <trackbot> Created ACTION-108 - Add clarification on what use
    cases for testing tf focus on [on Clarke Stevens - due
    2013-04-10].

    <giuseppep> bryan: no problem, is ok to have these discussions

    <scribe> ACTION: Bin to coordinate with Mark on possible
    modification [recorded in
    [15]http://www.w3.org/2013/04/03-webtv-minutes.html#action03]

    <trackbot> Error finding 'Bin'. You can review and register
    nicknames at <[16]http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/users>.

      [16] http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/users%3E.

    clarke: will continue to use wiki format for web&tv testing
    requirements document

    [ adjourned ]

Summary of Action Items

    [NEW] ACTION: Bin to coordinate with Mark on possible
    modification [recorded in
    [17]http://www.w3.org/2013/04/03-webtv-minutes.html#action03]
    [NEW] ACTION: clarke to add clarification on what use cases for
    testing tf focus on [recorded in
    [18]http://www.w3.org/2013/04/03-webtv-minutes.html#action02]
    [NEW] ACTION: giuseppe to work with kaz to create an online
    poll [recorded in
    [19]http://www.w3.org/2013/04/03-webtv-minutes.html#action01]

    [End of minutes]
      __________________________________________________________


     Minutes formatted by David Booth's [20]scribe.perl version
     1.137 ([21]CVS log)
     $Date: 2013-04-03 18:14:48 $


-- 
Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Web&TV, MMI and Voice
Tel: +81 466 49 1170

Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2013 21:43:31 UTC