W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-and-tv@w3.org > March 2012

Re: [profile] Profile spec title

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 08:34:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+de+mG2CDKN7CxSXsazLJJHA4KDdaAp8V_bY35uesnxeQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
Cc: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>, "GAUSMAN, PAUL" <pg2483@att.com>
I was going to suggest something like this, but glad it has been proposed.
I would suggest capitalizing Profile also, i.e., "Web Media Profile".

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>wrote:

> On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:50:42 +0100, GAUSMAN, PAUL <pg2483@att.com> wrote:
>
>  Why not:
>>
>> "Web Media profile"
>> Guidelines for integration of interactive media services in a
>> browser-based environment
>>
>> ...and point out the video stuff within the document structure.
>>
>>  Sounds good to me as well. Anybody disagree?
>
> /g
>
>
>  Thanks!
>> -Paul
>>
>> Q me
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Giuseppe Pascale [mailto:giuseppep@opera.com]
>> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 3:00 AM
>> To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org; david.corvoysier@orange.com; Robin Berjon
>> Subject: Re: [profile] Profile spec title
>>
>> I'm not convinced about the world "platform", it seems to imply a lot more
>> than what we are aiming too.
>> And since guidelines it seems to be used in W3C for a type of documents
>> that is different from our document I'll than propose to stick to
>> "profile".
>>
>> Even though I agree with Robin that profile tend to generate bad feelings,
>> at the end of the day a profile is what we are doing.
>> And anyway I hope people will not judge the book from its cover.
>>
>> Finally, as a more generic alternative for TV I can propose media.
>>
>> So the title would be
>>
>> "Web Media profile"
>> Guidelines for integration of interactive video services in a
>> browser-based environment
>>
>> If nobody disagree I'll use this. Hopefully we can have more discussions
>> on other topics ;)
>>
>> /g
>>
>> On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:27:47 +0100, <david.corvoysier@orange.com> wrote:
>>
>>  I wouldn't argue too much on the exact wording unless it explicitly
>>> states that the scope of the document is reduced to "resource-limited
>>> devices", which is exactly what I want to avoid: the whole point of the
>>> document is to improve interoperability, not to create yet another
>>> target for service providers ...
>>>
>>> That said, the following Robin+giuseppe remix would suit me:
>>>
>>> "Web and TV platform"
>>> Guidelines for integration of interactive video services in a
>>> browser-based environment
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Giuseppe Pascale
> TV & Connected Devices
> Opera Software
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 15:34:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:44:06 UTC