W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-and-tv@w3.org > February 2012

RE: [profile] Profile spec title

From: Dewa, Yoshiharu (OSAKI) <Yoshiharu.Dewa@jp.sony.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:53:42 +0900
To: "Vickers, Mark" <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com>, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
CC: Jan Lindquist <jan.lindquist@ericsson.com>, "public-web-and-tv@w3.org WG" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Message-ID: <6A8BDC92B4A45A419B514E55D54F4354D3990BF138@JPTKYXMS205.jp.sony.com>
All,

I would like to keep some word for CE devices. If it just say "interactive video services", the baseline for measurement of some parameters and/or sub setting will rather be vague and the result will be unpractical.

Rgs,
-- Yoshiharu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vickers, Mark [mailto:Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 3:10 AM
> To: Giuseppe Pascale
> Cc: Jan Lindquist; public-web-and-tv@w3.org WG
> Subject: Re: [profile] Profile spec title
> 
> "Web and TV" is very unclear in meaning. We constantly have to explain that
> the Web and TV IG is not limited to TV devices. We shouldn't extend this
> confusion to the profile spec. I believe the profile is defining client
> requirements for displaying video services and so "Video Services" should
> be in the title.
> 
> 
> On Feb 7, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Giuseppe Pascale wrote:
> 
> > Would one of the following title+subtitle address both needs?:
> >
> > "Web and TV profile"
> > Guidelines for integration of interactive video services in a
> browser-based environment
> >
> > "Web and TV guidelines"
> > A profile of HTML5 and other web technologies for interactive video
> services
> >
> > /g
> > On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:58:23 +0100, Jan Lindquist
> <jan.lindquist@ericsson.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> The profile is not only about HTML5 but other W3c standards so it would
> be misleading to have HTML5 in the title. In the spirit of the IG how about
> "web and TV profile". The name of the profile is not as critical as knowing
> the breadth of the areas it should cover. This profile may live for a while
> and it in the context of the industry attempt to influence the work in W3C
> with a clear list of specs that are being used and how they may be used.
> It will become a reference point by other standard groups. By using the
> same name as the IG it can help see the relationship.
> >> Regards,
> >> JanL
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Vickers, Mark [mailto:Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com]
> >>> Sent: den 7 februari 2012 15:24
> >>> To: Giuseppe Pascale
> >>> Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org WG
> >>> Subject: Re: [profile] Profile spec title
> >>>
> >>> How about "HTML5 Video Services Profile"?
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 3:28 AM, Giuseppe Pascale wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:26:40 +0100, Vickers, Mark
> >>> <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> 5. Title: The goal for me is a profile of HTML5 for video
> >>> services. There are two differences with "Web&TV Profile".
> >>> >> - I want to include HTML5 in the title because this is
> >>> HTML5-related
> >>> >> and HTM5-centric
> >>> >> - I don't like including "TV". This continues to cause
> >>> confusion. It is clearer to describe an HTML5 profile for
> >>> video services.
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> > I don't have strong opinions on the title but I would note
> >>> the following:
> >>> > - A title should be short ( the subtitle explains a bit
> >>> more what we are doing).
> >>> > - I've tried to use the word "TV services" in the subtitle that is
> >>> > hopefully a bit less confusing (or maybe not?). I have defined this
> >>> > term as
> >>> >
> >>> > "For the purposes of this document a TV service is a
> >>> commercial video service that may include elements of
> >>> interactivity and that provides a coherent user experience.
> >>> >
> >>> > - while this profile is html5 based this is not only about
> >>> html5. I'm not against highlighting the HTML5 centric
> >>> approach but I wouldn't call this "an html5 profile".
> >>> >
> >>> > So in short: I'm fine with your comments but I cannot come
> >>> up with a better title/subtitle. Suggestions are welcome.
> >>> >
> >>> > /g
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >> See you on the call.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Thanks,
> >>> >> mav
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Feb 6, 2012, at 6:15 AM, Giuseppe Pascale wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> One note: the zakim bridge is overbooked.
> >>> >>> So just in case we see that people have problem dialing
> >>> in (in such
> >>> >>> case please login on IRC and let us know) I set-up this
> >>> Opera bridge.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> NOTE: ONLY TO BE USED IF WE SEE THAT ZAKIM DOESN'T WORK
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Phone bridge details:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Conference ID:            33909
> >>> >>> Start Date and Time:      Monday 06.02.2012 17:00:00 CET/CEST
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Bridge Numbers:
> >>> >>> Norway                           +47 23 69 26 03
> >>> >>> USA                                +1 800 201 4229 (Toll-Free)
> >>> >>> Poland (Wroclaw)	        +48 71 719 6099
> >>> >>> Poland (Warsaw)         	+48 22 262 0799
> >>> >>> Japan                             +81 3 5435 8394
> >>> >>> Russia				  +7 812 448 7876
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Conference Name:          tv profile
> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------
> >>> >>> Please contact SysAdmin at +47 23 69 33 60 for assistance.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> /g
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 12:06:15 +0100, Giuseppe Pascale
> >>> <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> Here the call details for todays call
> >>> >>>> (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile/Telco)
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Schedule: Monday, 16:00Z (=8:00 Pacific, 11:00 Eastern, 17:00
> >>> >>>> Europe, 01:00 Korea/Japan)
> >>> >>>> Phone: US: +1 617 761 6200 or SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org Conference
> >>> >>>> Code: 26632 IRC channel: #webtv
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> And here the Agenda for todays call:
> >>> >>>>
> (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile/Agenda_Telco_6/2/2012)
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> * Review of Charter
> >>> >>>> (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile/Charter)
> >>> >>>> * Call schedule
> >>> >>>> * TF tools (http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile)
> >>> >>>> * Process
> >>> >>>> * Initial feedbacks on the draft
> >>> >>>> (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webtv/raw-file/tip/tvprofile/tv.html)
> >>> >>>> * AOB
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> /g
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:00:59 +0100, Giuseppe Pascale
> >>> <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>> >>>>> the poll [1] is now closed and the winner is...
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Monday, February 6, 2012 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM UTC
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> In this first call we will discuss the scope of the TV
> >>> profile work, how do we want the group to be organized and
> >>> timeline (if any).
> >>> >>>>> If you have any other topic you want to add to the
> >>> agenda let me know.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> I'll send around call details ASAP.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> [1] http://doodle.com/h6rfnkrqyi3uinpi
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> --
> >>> >>> Giuseppe Pascale
> >>> >>> TV & Connected Devices
> >>> >>> Opera Software
> >>> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Giuseppe Pascale
> >>> > TV & Connected Devices
> >>> > Opera Software
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Giuseppe Pascale
> > TV & Connected Devices
> > Opera Software
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 00:57:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:44:06 UTC