- From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:47:05 +0100
- To: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org WG" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>, "Vickers, Mark" <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com>
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:26:40 +0100, Vickers, Mark <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > Web&TV Folks: > 4. Survey: I'm wondering if it would be useful to do a survey of non-W3C > web extensions related to video services and try to collect those in a > document. We could then review this and see which are covered by HTML5 > and other W3C specifications and which are not. > This is indeed an interesting idea. As I see it there are 2 things we can do (non mutually exclusive): * People on this list that have experience with one or more "extensions" can start documenting them. These surveys can be written directly on the wiki, under this section: http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Profile#Surveys_of_non-W3C_extensions_in_the_TV_space We don't need a detailed analysis at this stage, is enough an overview of what are these extensions and which use cases they address. Volunteers? * We can directly reach out to relevant groups and ask for feedbacks. The final goal is NOT to incorporate such extensions as is (since we will find incompatible extensions or extensions that don't fit well with the html5 architecture) but to make sure that our profile covers the same use cases. -- Giuseppe Pascale TV & Connected Devices Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 08:50:13 UTC