W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-and-tv@w3.org > April 2012

Re: [profile] Reminder profile call on Monday 2nd April, 11.00 Boston local

From: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:04:46 +0200
To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.wb5ax8h46ugkrk@giuseppep-x220>
Minutes from the call available here:

   http://www.w3.org/2012/04/02-webtv-minutes.html

Also text below:




                           Profile TF Teleconf

02 Apr 2012

    [2]Agenda

       [2] http://www.w3.org/mid/op.wbzs51w36ugkrk@giuseppep-x220

    See also: [3]IRC log

       [3] http://www.w3.org/2012/04/02-webtv-irc

Attendees

    Present
           Mark_Vickers, glenn, giuseppe, David_Corvoysier, Dewa,
           Jan_Lindquist, Philipp, Russell, Juhani, yosuke,
           John_Simmons

    Regrets
    Chair
           giuseppe

    Scribe
           jan, janl

Contents

      * [4]Topics
          1. [5]OIPF Liaison letter
          2. [6]new issues in Bugzilla
          3. [7]Profile work process
          4. [8]AOB
      * [9]Summary of Action Items
      __________________________________________________________

    <ph> scribe: jan

    <ph> scribe: janl

    liaison letter topic is first

    <giuseppe>
    [10]http://www.w3.org/mid/op.wbzrdelr6ugkrk@giuseppep-x220

      [10] http://www.w3.org/mid/op.wbzrdelr6ugkrk@giuseppep-x220

    to be discussed

OIPF Liaison letter

    what was discussed is summarized

    plus status of the w3c drafts

    extend bugzilla to external groups

    in order to give input like requirements to influence the work
    to the WG

    webtv would then facilitate this input

    there was comments on the proposal

    the comments was positive

    any further comments can be forwarded to giuseppe

new issues in Bugzilla

    next issue are the bugzilla raised issues

    group brings up the requirements that is input to the profile

    david raised issues

    <giuseppe>
    [11]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16479

      [11] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16479

    <giuseppe>
    [12]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16480

      [12] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16480

    he has issues with the template that there is alot of areas to
    fill in

    it will take time to go through

    caching of video objects is implied

    "finish on hold message"

    for sake of optimization html spec should clarify garbage
    collected of content

    <Mark_Vickers> Perhapsnext time the hold voice comes on, we
    should be quiet and zakim should listen so we can hang it up.

    wording in specification may address the issue

    giuseppe comment is a valid input that it is worth discussing
    in mptf

    using bugzilla will facilitate moving issues like these to the
    other Task Force

    only issue with profile is that this is not new for desktop

    gius this is meant for platform indep

    once there is a draft text then it can be used as input to the
    profile

    better input if taken in mptf

    not to mix both task force

    bugzilla will be used by all TF's in webtv

    mptf has regular phone conferences, every Thursday

    next bug being discussed

    epg mozaic overlayed on video

    easier to use the image map

    but not allowed on video element

    this should be discussed in mptf

    is conclusion is that if we only need guidelines then we
    collect them in profile

    gius conclusion move it to mptf

    <scribe> finished with agenda

Profile work process

    giuseppe moderates the input from teh group

    the group needs to provide the input as to what should be
    included

    without input there is nothing to be discussed

    do people agree with approach?

    mark says that this makes sense

    although input may take longer

    +

    bugzilla will be used to control the input

    jan comment that using bugzilla makes sense and will help
    facilitate the work and all the input

AOB

    mobile core platform is defining profiles

    Glenn spoke

    they use wiki for collecting input to the draft

    the work is being done in the community group

    <glenn> [13]http://coremob.github.com/level-0/index.html

      [13] http://coremob.github.com/level-0/index.html

    <glenn>
    [14]https://raw.github.com/coremob/level-1/master/index.html

      [14] https://raw.github.com/coremob/level-1/master/index.html

    gius may use similar approach to this group

    <glenn>
    [15]http://www.w3.org/community/coremob/wiki/Specs/Coremob_Leve
    l_0

      [15] http://www.w3.org/community/coremob/wiki/Specs/Coremob_Level_0

    <glenn>
    [16]http://www.w3.org/community/coremob/wiki/Specs/Coremob_Leve
    l_1

      [16] http://www.w3.org/community/coremob/wiki/Specs/Coremob_Level_1

    gius looking at css section

    outstanding point for people to provide input

    mark says which group does profile for web on a automobile

    meeting is closed without any more discussion points

    <glenn>
    [17]http://www.w3.org/community/coremob/wiki/Related_Efforts

      [17] http://www.w3.org/community/coremob/wiki/Related_Efforts

    call completed

    <glenn> cites the Web & TV profile work


    [End of minutes]
      __________________________________________________________
-- 
Giuseppe Pascale
TV & Connected Devices
Opera Software
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 16:05:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:44:06 UTC