Re: [HOME_NETWORK_TF] Identified gaps (was Re: [HOME_NETWORK_TF] Finalizing the HNTF req doc)

Hi Giuseppe,

Thanks a lot for updating the draft HNTF Requirements document!
The document looks great to me.

BTW, there are several descriptions of "Relevant Use Cases Include: @@@@".
Do you think it might be better we say "Relevant Use Cases Include: TBD"
instead?

Thanks,

Kazuyuki


On 10/04/2011 06:56 PM, Giuseppe Pascale wrote:
> I've added a new section based on the F2F discussion and the feedbacks I got on this list.
>
> Please let me know if you have any other comment:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/HNTF/Home_Network_TF_Requirements#Identified_Gaps
>
>
> /g
>
> On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:32:53 +0200, Jean-Claude Dufourd <jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr> wrote:
>
>> On 3/10/11 15:35 , Giuseppe Pascale wrote:
>>>
>>> [[
>>> Some concerns were raised if the discovery alone is enough to address advertisements requirements especially for support of existing protocols such as UPnP. In fact, advertisements itself could be implemented as a service so that applications can discover it and then register to be advertised on the network. Such a service may be provided by the UA itself (i.e. the functionality is provided by the UA but exposed as a service). Is not clear though (lucking implementations of this) if this approach will be enough flexible and efficient.
>>>
>>> ****Furthermore to have an interoperable solution, a common advertising service would have to be standardized or JS binding to already in use advertising services/protocols would have to be provided.***
>>>
>>> The discussion will have to be deferred to the point in time when a UA supporting discovery will be available.
>>> ]]
>> JCD: Yes, that works. Thanks.
>> Best regards
>> JC
>>
>
>

-- 
Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Web&TV, MMI and Voice
Tel: +81 466 49 1170

Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 13:13:57 UTC