W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-and-tv@w3.org > November 2011

RE: [MEDIA_PIPELINE_TF] Updated TPAC slides

From: Jan Lindquist <jan.lindquist@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:09:49 +0100
To: "Vickers, Mark" <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com>, Clarke Stevens <C.Stevens@cablelabs.com>
CC: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Message-ID: <82276AE38FD87A4C9CF6C820AC5276EA34791044AA@ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se>
Hi Mark,

That is a lot of slides for 5 minutes. If you go too quickly over them things will not sinc in. Suggest possibly animation and stick to 5 slides or so.

This still does not address the MPTF slides and adding a reference to OIPF. Not all bullets I have listed need to be included but possibly as requested the example errors and states. If I get the latest version of the slides (if that is Clarke's last e-mail) then I can make a proposal on the 3 slides. Nothing lengthy but just to give concrete suggestions based on OIPF.

Regards,
JanL

________________________________
From: Vickers, Mark [mailto:Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com]
Sent: den 2 november 2011 07:09
To: Jan Lindquist
Cc: Clarke Stevens; public-web-and-tv@w3.org
Subject: Re: [MEDIA_PIPELINE_TF] Updated TPAC slides

By the way, here's the intro slides I'm presenting to introduce the Clarke and Giuseppe presentations. I forgot to send them to the list. They are just a very basic introduction to the two task groups. There are quite a few slides, but I'll just be clicking through them to in less than five minutes.

I'm happy to make last-minute changes, if needed.

Thanks,
mav



On Nov 2, 2011, at 5:29 AM, Jan Lindquist wrote:

> I am getting error responses on the e-mail I sent so so I am resending the e-mail without attachment. The attachment relates to what I e-mailed on Sunday.
>
> Regards,
> JanL
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Lindquist
> Sent: den 1 november 2011 09:22
> To: 'Clarke Stevens'; public-web-and-tv@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [MEDIA_PIPELINE_TF] Updated TPAC slides
>
> Hello Clarke,
>
> I would appreciate having these additions added to the TPAC slides. The only comment I received were positive.
>
> As requested in the phone conference in the last MPTF I have provided examples of additions to "suggested changes" with the work done in OIPF. These additions provide concrete examples of deployments that W3C can refer to. A hot topic is related to DRM and in the examples I have a list of examples of information that is exchanged like error codes, state changes, etc.
>
> Thank you,
> JanL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clarke Stevens [mailto:C.Stevens@cablelabs.com]
> Sent: den 31 oktober 2011 21:37
> To: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [MEDIA_PIPELINE_TF] Updated TPAC slides
>
> One mover version. I added references to LC bug 12399.
>
> -Clarke
>
> On 10/31/11 12:26 PM, "Clarke Stevens" <C.Stevens@CableLabs.com> wrote:
>
>> Here are the slides with some additional updates after discussions on
>> the MPTF reflector. This is the deck I plan to use for discussions with
>> the HTML WG.
>>
>> I will prepare a simplified version of this deck for presentation at
>> the plenary session. I'll send this out later today.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Clarke
>>
>>
>> On 10/27/11 4:25 PM, "Clarke Stevens" <C.Stevens@CableLabs.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I made changes to the slides based on feedback during the meeting and
>>> some emailed comments afterwards. Please let me know of any other
>>> suggested changes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Clarke
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2011 15:10:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 2 November 2011 15:10:45 GMT