- From: Matt Hammond <matt.hammond@rd.bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 16:43:24 +0100
- To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
Hi Dan, On Tue, 31 May 2011 16:33:09 +0100, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > On 31 May 2011 17:22, Matt Hammond <matt.hammond@rd.bbc.co.uk> wrote: >> As suggested in the conference call, here is a suggestion for an >> improved >> definition of 'programme' for the requirements document: >> >> A programme or content comprises a single period of audio visual >> content. > > Do you mean "or content item" here? "Content" is usually a mass noun > in these discussions, isn't it? "Content item" does seem more accurate. >> It is usually expected to be labelled in content directories or >> television >> programme guides as a single entity. This might include an episode of a >> television programme, a radio programme, or a movie. >> >> Comments are welcome. > > Sounds ok to me. Does it fit also with > http://www.bbc.co.uk/ontologies/programmes/2009-09-07.shtml#Programme > as far as you know? That is a minefield :-) My intention with this definition is probably closest to po:broadcast or po:episode. As far as I can tell, none of the use cases so far seem to show any need (yet) to distinuish which of these two it is. regards Matt -- | Matt Hammond | Research Engineer, BBC R&D, Centre House, London | http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 15:43:54 UTC