Re: Another draft Re: IG charter: modification suggestion

I've just installed Chales' updated draft.

Please reload:
http://www.w3.org/2010/09/webTVIGcharter.html

Kazuyuki


On 09/29/2010 10:38 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:57:35 +0200, FUNAHASHI Yosuke
> <yfuna@tomo-digi.co.jp> wrote:
> ...
>> I have reviewed the initial draft charter and wrote out my
>> modification suggstion.
>
> I have forwarded an edited version to Kaz for posting on the website.
> The vast majority of the proposed modifications I have kept, with the
> following exceptions:
>
> 1. I removed the short name of the group. I think it will be Web and TV,
> but I don't think we will be able to enforce what people call it anyway;
> 2. I have changed the teleconference schedule to be "as needed" (and
> specified that chairs can call meetings as needed);
> 3. I have retained the paragraph that Funahashi-san suggested deleting
> about review of W3C work being a deliverable;
> 4. I have removed DRM as an explicit example from the "things we are not
> sure where they should be done". I am concerned that naming it (and
> nothing else in the whole document) will cause unecessary tension and
> bureaucratic delay before we get to deal with the actual issue; and
> 5. I have reverted to having the Interest Group open to all (but made
> the patent policy commitment requirement more explicit in the
> participation section and tweaked the decision process somewhat).
>
> I have also introduced the following changes:
>
> 1. Added as an explicit deliverable to process output from further
> workshops or face-to-face meetings on the same basis as for those of the
> Tokyo workshop;
> 2. Added as a potential deliverable a W3C Note describing the
> relationship between TV and Web (as noted in Funahashi-san's addition to
> the scope);
> 3. I shifted the first deliverable due date to 30 January (this process
> is taking too much time already and distracting us from actual work :( ).
> 4. In the decision policy I have stated that a consensus position is one
> agreed to by the W3C members in the group, but where people in the group
> (W3C member or no) take dissenting positions, they have to forwarded
> together with any consensus position. (This is to encourage the group to
> either decide or pass the work and let the relevant Working Group make
> the decision based on broad input).
> 5. I have also clarified that a decision made at a meeting or
> teleconference is subject to a time-limited review period on the mailing
> list before it can be considered an agreement of the group.
> 6. All the links should be either working, or href="@@" (if they go to
> the Interest Group's home page because I don't have a URI for that).
>
> And while I fixed some typos (thanks Yosuke ;) ) I probably introduced
> some new ones :|
>
> cheers
>
> Chaals
>

-- 
Kazuyuki Ashimura / W3C Multimodal & Voice Activity Lead
mailto: ashimura@w3.org
voice: +81.466.49.1170 / fax: +81.466.49.1171

Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 16:00:10 UTC