Re: A stray mention of "conformance" in SC 4.1.1

actually
    I think this is editorial -- since the group did decide to remove these and we just missed one.   If we can remove it for the publication - I would so that what is reviewed is what we intend to publish.  

	ALSO - if there is a problem -- it can be added back later.  But  I don't see anyone on the TF or WG that would object -- and we did a specific action to hunt and find these - and remove them.   So I would opt for removing it.

(for those not conversant with why we are removing occurances of "conform" -- the reason is that this is just an informative note -- and not a standard.  As a result you  cannot CONFORM to WCAG2ICT.  


	This is published to our public list --so if someone feels otherwise the can comment.     

	OR - If it is just too late to make the edit.  it is OK

	But otherwise I think we should correct the oversight and send for  comment in correct form.

	if ANYONE feels otherwise though - we should delay and talk about it.


Gregg
--------------------------------------------------------
Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Director Trace R&D Center
Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering
and Biomedical Engineering University of Wisconsin-Madison
Technical Director - Cloud4all Project - http://Cloud4all.info
Co-Director, Raising the Floor - International - http://Raisingthefloor.org
and the Global Public Inclusive Infrastructure Project -  http://GPII.net

On Jul 10, 2013, at 2:29 PM, Peter Korn <peter.korn@oracle.com> wrote:

> Hi gang,
> 
> Staring at our latest draft, I noticed a stray reference to "conformance" in 4.1.1 Parsing.  The reference is in our first Note:
> 
> Note: Markup is not always available to assistive technologies or to user selectable user agents such as browsers.  Software sometimes uses markup languages internally for persistence of the software user interface, in ways where the markup is never available to assistive technology (either directly or through a document object model (DOM)), or to a user agent (such as a browser). In such cases, conformance to this provision would have no impact on accessibility as it can have for web content where it is exposed.
> 
> 
> I am NOT suggesting we try to fix this before publication tomorrow.  But for our FINAL draft, I think we can simply delete "conformance to" from that sentence, so the last sentence would read: " In such cases, this provision would have no impact on accessibility as it can have for web content where it is exposed."
> 
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> 
> Peter
> -- 
> <oracle_sig_logo.gif>
> Peter Korn | Accessibility Principal
> Phone: +1 650 5069522 
> 500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065 
> <green-for-email-sig_0.gif> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment