Changes made to the comparison wiki page, ahead of our meeting tomorrow

Hi gang,

In order to help make our meeting tomorrow more efficient (and was hoped 
our previous meeting last Friday), Mike did an analysis of the survey 
feedback, noting where the survey feedback seemed to be in agreement and 
where it didn't.

I have taken his analysis notes, and transferred the survey feedback 
summary/conclusions into a new column added as the rightmost of our two 
tables comparing documents and comparing software, at 
https://sites.google.com/site/wcag2ict/cross-cutting-issues-and-notes/comparison-to-m376

This new column is titled "TF Resolution", and the intent is that it 
will contain the final TF resolutions once we are done.  For now, 
however, it contains Mike's survey feedback notes with the exception of 
the ONE SC we did manage to discuss and reach consensus on last week - 
SC 1.4.4 for documents.

The editorial plan is that as we reach consensus on each of these, we 
will add a "consensus date" to them, and I will also change the color 
highlight to teal to indicate consensus was reached (see that in SC 
1.4.4 for documents).  Anything without such a date and highlight color 
is not yet a TF consensus, but is rather at best a "potential consensus" 
based on survey feedback (those are highlighted in green, and typically 
read "TF agrees...").

For the purposes of efficiently going through these 71 SCs, we may want 
to follow the color coding and quickly dispatch those that seem easy 
first (which will generally be the green highlighted ones)...


Regards,

Peter
-- 
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Peter Korn | Accessibility Principal
Phone: +1 650 5069522 <tel:+1%20650%205069522>
500 Oracle Parkway | Redwood City, CA 94065
Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to 
developing practices and products that help protect the environment